- Handicapping The Summer Hit Of 2012
- TECHSURVEY8: An Interview with Jacobs Media President Fred Jacobs
- Program Directors and Communicating
- Fresh Listen: Miami's Refreshing AC Battle
- Huge Sports Radio Shift in Salt Lake City: Discussion
- Gainesville, GA: News/Talk/Sports "Bulldog" Gives Way to "Chuck, We Play Everything"
- What's Next for Cumulus/Houston?
- News/Talk WIBQ/Terre Haute Names Mark Jaynes PD/ND: Discussion
- Downsized by a RIF? Tell the Industry You're Looking for Work on Our Free Jobs Board
The Future Is Now
This essay, FM on the iPhone: The Story Is Not Yet Told, was written by Jim Kerr for Radio-Info.com's The Future Is Now column.
FM on the iPhone: The Story Is Not Yet Told
While the news that the iPhone and iPod FM chip might be activated, allowing FM radio integration with these mobile devices, is interesting, I’m not sure it achieves anything at the consumer level. For iPhone users, accessing radio has been something they’ve been doing for a long time. The only difference is that they access it via apps and streams. But, to them, they’re still listening to “radio.” Researcher Mark Ramsey has been particularly eloquent on this point recently.
But I think the most important part of the FM/iPhone rumor is the part that we don’t have information on yet: The actual software. The current model on the iPhone to initiate streaming is via stand-alone apps or limited directories. But this is not the familiar and functional model consumers are used to: They want presets. And not just presets, but presets of all their stations. For example, Radiotime powers the Wonder Radio app, which is a fantastic directory on the iPhone, but it doesn’t include all terrestrial streams.
Thus, what we have is a vacuum between what is delivered—mulitiple apps and limited directories—and what consumers want: The infinite dial (to use the wonderful phrase coined by our friends at Edison Media). Which brings me back to the FM tuner: What if the tuner is just part of a larger play by Apple to create a unified streaming radio experience via an integrated radio app (or radio.app in fanboi parlance)?
The good news is that this would create that infinite dial for the consumer and that infinite dial would include terrestrial radio. The bad news is that terrestrial radio would be in an even more vulnerable position to Internet streams—they’d all be playing on the same playing field and via a single app. Presets could include not just FM stations, but also a nearly limitless number of Internet streams. This would be akin to all of streaming audio suddenly being available on your car radio.
While this is pure guesswork on my part, it is certainly where audio delivery has been heading for some time, and it is the kind of vacuum that Apple would rush to fill. Apple also has the juice to make this happen. Web broadcasters that may have been loathe to sign agreements with other aggregators may see the universal distribution model of the iPod/iPhone as too good to pass up. We certainly have seen this in the music business with iTunes.
In the end, then, what we don’t know about FM on the iPhone and iPod is much more critical than what we do (presumably) know: If Apple does create a unified radio app that includes streaming radio, then radio isn’t in any better shape than they were before—They are competing not just against each other, but the entire spectrum of audio broadcasters. In this world, the infinite dial will have become a reality, and the thing that radio has been fighting for—an FM receiver on iPhones and iPods—may be the very thing that delivers what radio has been fighting against—the mass distribution and acceptance of streaming and Internet-delivered radio.
You can read more from Jim Kerr at: TritonDigitalMedia.com/blog.
About the Writer
Jim Kerr is one of our many guest writers at Radio-Info.com. We regularly publish articles from industry professionals to help keep our readers informed on the latest trends and developments in the radio industry.
Comments
Wanna join the discussion?
You must login or register in order to post comments.
Why would we expect apple to Act like the FCC and help us protect our turf? Apple maximizes revenue by creating the best user experience for the most people possible. If this means letting users define 'radio' as anything that they can listen to on the infinite dial, then I'd fully expect Apple to deliver it (as long as it's itunes compatible) What we know/don't know about the iPhone isn't important at all. What radio does to make and market compelling content is the only thing that really matters.
Good thoughts Jim. Sooner or later Internet Radio will be part of our entertainment choices. I don't think we can stop it. I also don't think we should waste a minute in getting Radio on every audio delivery device that comes along. Without a level playing field that equal distribution will give us our content improvement efforts will be for naught.
I would welcome an fm tuner on my mobile phone. When I listen to web stations on my Blackberry my battery life is short. I would think an fm tuner would draw less power. It would make it more convienient to listen to local stations or stations when I travel.
Good points - especially the comment about "presets." Arnon Mishkin had a great post about presets the other day over at Paid Content - http://bit.ly/4qLl7c. Imagine this - an iPhone app from a radio station that accesses the FM tuner AND the station's stream, switching from one to the other when appropriate (like when the FM signal is weak, but the broadband connection is strong - or vice versa). This app would work with the station's RDS system, allowing immediate response to ads, songs (like iTunes tagging, but better). And, it would tune only the sponsoring station. Plus - it would act as a twitter client, facebook client, etc., allowing social networking between listeners. A preset - on steroids!




























